“If we’re Sydney Sweeney, we’re killing the Disney studios,” protested the desperate fans that the Disney CEO revealed that the black actress Francesca Amewudah-Rivers was elegida to interpret to the princess.
The announcement of a new project with live action from Disney Studios has provoked an immediate controversy, divided among fans and sparked the heated debate on social media platforms. The CEO of Disney confirmed that the studio had elected the star in the rise Francesca Amewudah-Rivers to return to Rapunzel, a decision that was destined to trace a “new type of magic” to the very best of hadas. Sin embargo, in the spirit of universal emotion, the casting election was met with an intense reaction, with fans that followed a viral slogan: “If we are Sydney Sweeney, we love the Disney studios”.
During these weeks, the speculation in the past has had a series of elegance as Rapunzel has dominated online discussions. Many fanatics enjoyed a great campaign for the actress Sydney Sweeney, believing that her appearance and her growing popularity coincided perfectly with the iconic princess with her long golden hair. As Francesca Amewudah-Rivers, a black act, was officially announced, the waves of shock spread across the fandom. The critics affirmed that the casting was short of the original animated character and called on Disney to prioritize the identity policy over loyalty to the story.
The social laws quickly converted into the scenario of a massive protest. Hashtags like #notmyrapunzel, #tangleddisaster and #sydneyforrapunzel tend to trend in times of day. Countless memes, petitions and reaction videos across platforms like X and Tiktok, many of them expressing outrage at Disney’s decision. Algunos included llegaron requiring a book of the film, although the studio was “destroying the magic” of an appreciated history of childhood. The most viral protest line, “if we are Sydney Sweeney, we hear about Disney studios”, has been repeated for miles in the communities of fans.
Weighing the violent reaction, we also defended Disney’s decision, praising the studio for a bold step with greater diversity in its narrative. The participants argue that the cuentos de hadas have always evolved with each new collection and that the launch of Francesca Amewudah-Rivers offers the opportunity to reinterpret Rapunzel in a way that resonates with the modern public. For these fanatics, the critic directed the action towards a more profound racial theme within certain sections of the fanatic base. “Rapunzel is more than just her hair color or skin tone,” wrote an online follower. “The magic of history comes from its heart, its spirit and its life”.
The controversy is the last of a series of heated debates that rode Disney’s casting options into live action adaptations. The studio encountered similar critiques during the launch of The Little Mermaid when Halle Bailey was chosen to interpret Ariel, generating arguments about representation and authenticity. Although this film finally met the film, the response suggested that Disney was happy to balance the expectations of fans with its impulse for inclusion.
As production for advances made, all eyes are permanent in Disney and Francesca Amewudah-Rivers. Did the protests fade away when the public saw their action, or did the outrage turn into a big escalator? Now, the future of this is a collection of hadas cues in the balance, eclipsed by a growing torment of divided opinions and the implacable voices of the fanatics who believe that his rapunzel should live like Sydney Sweeney.
