Previously, there were reports of inconsistencies in her statements, and her father denied certain details related to the case. However, the judge rejected Jay-Z’s legal team’s request to expedite the trial process and force the plaintiff to reveal her identity.

A federal judge has approved that the plaintiff, referred to as “Jane Doe,” may proceed with the case while maintaining her anonymity. However, the court also criticized Jay-Z’s legal team for filing repeated motions with inflammatory language and pressuring the judicial process. The judge emphasized that the judicial system would not be expedited simply because the attorneys demanded it.

Jay-Z and Diddy have denied all allegations, calling the claims a “blackmail attempt.” In a previous statement, Jay-Z described the accusations as “false and demonstrably untrue.”

The decision to allow Jane Doe to remain anonymous, for now, is a significant step. However, the judge noted that she might be required to disclose her identity later, enabling Jay-Z’s lawyers to gather necessary information for trial preparation. In similar cases, accusers often wish to remain anonymous to avoid public scrutiny and pressure.

This lawsuit has drawn attention not only because of the high-profile individuals involved but also because of its broader implications for similar cases. Both sides are working hard to protect their rights and reputations in this intense legal battle. However, the key question remains whether Jane Doe’s identity will eventually be revealed and what might happen next.