1. The Historical Jesus:

Scholars generally agree that Jesus was a Jewish man living in 1st-century Galilee, a region in the Middle East.
Based on this, his appearance would likely have been similar to other people of that time and place: olive-brown skin, dark hair, and brown eyes.
The term “Black” as used today is a modern social construct, not a historical marker, so it wouldn’t accurately describe Jesus’ ethnicity.

2. Symbolic Interpretations:

Some people use the term “Black Jesus” to represent the solidarity of marginalized or oppressed groups, particularly people of African descent, with the suffering and message of Jesus.
This is often seen as a way to connect the struggles of the Black community to the biblical narrative of liberation.
It’s not typically a literal claim about his skin color but a symbolic representation of a shared experience.

3. Art and Representation:

Throughout history, depictions of Jesus have varied widely, often reflecting the culture and ethnicity of the artist and the audience.
In many European countries, he has often been portrayed with lighter skin and European features.
However, in African countries, it’s common to see Jesus portrayed with darker skin and Afrocentric features.

Regarding Elon Musk’s statement:

It’s highly unlikely that Musk has any kind of historical “proof” that Jesus was Black, considering the scholarly consensus.
His statement is likely either a misunderstanding of the issue or a statement that needs further context to be fully understood.
Statements like this could be interpreted as inflammatory or disrespectful to both Christian and Black communities.

In conclusion: While it’s important to recognize the symbolic significance of a “Black Jesus” for some, the historical figure most likely had the appearance of a Middle Eastern Jew. Claims of “proof” of Jesus being Black should be examined carefully within these contexts and the potential for misunderstanding.