In a stunning escalation of tensions, former President Donald Trump has launched an all-out verbal assault on tech mogul Elon Musk. On Truth Social, Trump suggested that he might “take a look” at deporting Musk and ominously claimed that the cryptocurrency DOGE-referred to as “the monster”-might “eat Elon.” The comments come after Musk threatened to fund primary challenges against any lawmaker who votes for what he describes as the “big, beautiful bill”—a piece of legislation that Trump is fiercely criticizing.
Trump’s Scathing Remarks on Musk and Electric Vehicles
The gloves are now fully off in the ongoing feud between the two prominent figures. Trump’s scathing comments were fueled by Musk’s vocal criticism of a bill that Trump believes will significantly increase national debt. According to Trump, his disagreement with Musk stems from the billionaire’s strong support of the electric vehicle (EV) mandate, which Trump has long opposed.

On Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous and was always a major part of my campaign.” Trump, who has previously criticized EV policies as harmful to traditional automotive industries, suggested that Musk’s promotion of electric vehicles was motivated by the substantial subsidies Musk receives for his companies, notably Tesla and SpaceX.
“Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one. Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,” Trump added.
Trump’s comments centered on the idea that the subsidies Musk receives are unsustainable and harmful to the American economy. He claimed that, without these taxpayer-funded incentives, Musk’s operations ranging from rocket launches to electric car production-would collapse, saving the country “a fortune.” The DOGE Threat and Deportation Talk

The tension escalated when Trump, while speaking outside the White House, was asked about Steve Bannon’s suggestion to deport Musk. Trump’s response was chillingly ambiguous: “We’ll have to take a look.”
He went on to introduce DOGE into the narrative, adding, “We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know… You know what DOGE is?” Trump continued, “DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn’t that be terrible? He gets a lot of subsidies.”
Trump’s comments, part rant and part joke, were designed to criticize Musk’s reliance on government assistance, using the popular meme cryptocurrency DOGE as a metaphorical threat. Musk, a known proponent of DOGE, found himself at the receiving end of Trump’s playful but pointed remarks, symbolizing Trump’s frustration with Musk’s political influence and endorsement of electric vehicles.
However, it’s important to note that there is no national electric vehicle mandate in place that Trump could “terminate,” a fact that seems to have escaped his attention or perhaps was ignored for rhetorical effect. Trump’s statements, while inflammatory, were grounded in a highly distorted version of reality.
Musk’s Criticism of Trump’s Bill and a New Political Threat
Musk’s criticisms of Trump’s policies stemmed from the “big, beautiful bill,” which Musk has referred to as “the biggest debt increase in history.” Musk has vowed to use his influence to defeat any politician who votes for it, threatening to form a new political party if the bill passes into law.
While Trump’s focus has primarily been on the electric vehicle subsidies contained in the legislation, Musk’s attacks were squarely aimed at the astronomical costs associated with the bill. He warned that the bill would cripple America’s fiscal health and lead to long-term economic harm.

Trump, in turn, dismissed the legitimate concerns about the bill’s long-term impact on national debt, instead focusing his ire on Musk’s financial interests in the electric vehicle sector. The entire feud revolves around electric vehicles, with Trump and Musk on opposing sides of the issue. However, the reality of the bill extends far beyond the electric vehicle mandate.
The “Big, Beautiful Bill” and Its True Costs
The proposed bill, which has received bipartisan support from some corners of the political spectrum, carries with it a slew of disastrous provisions that could have far-reaching consequences. Beyond the cuts to subsidies for electric vehicles, the bill is a veritable disaster for the American public, slashing vital social services such as Medicaid, expanding military spending, and tightening restrictions on immigrants.

Moreover, the bill reinforces tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy and could significantly reduce access to food stamps, putting the most vulnerable Americans at risk. These elements of the legislation have largely been overshadowed by the back-and-forth between Trump and Musk, but they represent a far graver threat to the well-being of millions of citizens.
If passed, this bill could send the national debt soaring while simultaneously cutting vital programs that provide support to the poor, elderly, and disadvantaged. The rhetoric from both Trump and Musk obscures the true costs of the legislation, with both figures engaging in partisan sniping while the American people stand to suffer the consequences.
Trump vs. Musk: A Battle for the Future
The feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk represents much more than a disagreement over electric vehicles—it is a battle of ideologies, business interests, and political influence. Both men hold significant sway over public opinion, and their clash is bound to have lasting ramifications for American politics.
As for the “big, beautiful bill,” its passage would signify a massive shift in American fiscal policy, potentially burdening future generations with crippling debt. However, it is also a reminder of the extent to which political figures and billionaire moguls like Trump and Musk can turn even the smallest of disagreements into full-blown spectacles.

In the meantime, the public is left to wonder how far this feud will go. Will Trump’s threats of deportation turn into action, or is it all just rhetoric designed to score political points? Will Musk, disillusioned with Washington, really start a new political party, or will his influence be enough to reshape the existing system? Whatever happens, it’s clear that the gloves are off, and the battle for the future of American policy is far from over.